bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] woolsey.met vs. snowie.met (10.000 matches) finished


From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] woolsey.met vs. snowie.met (10.000 matches) finished
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:30:17 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:12:34PM +0100, Achim Mueller wrote
> 
> Final score: 4829
> 5171
> 
> 
> Comments on this?

51.7% +/- 1% 

So we're confident that snowie.met is better than woolsey.met. I think
1.7% +/- 1% is quite a difference.  This is compable to the improvements
of Snowie2 to SNowie3 and gnubg 0.13 to gnubg 0.14!

I'm not sure that the experiment is optimal. It might be better to check
each match score, e.g., play a number of games at each match score. A
wrong "entry" at -n,-m where n and m are small could make ripples
throughout the MET.

Maybe some of the other list readers can comment on this?

Jørn

Attachment: pgpYkBdXCNvbH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]