bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] slow gui (strace)


From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] slow gui (strace)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:16:50 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 02:44:59PM +0100, Achim Mueller wrote
> Hi folks,
> 
> concerning my problem with the slow gui (happens on three pc with
> different architecture, but all installed with suse-9.0 or gentoo
> linux) I did an strace. 

Maybe gentoo and suse include badly optimised GTK+ libraries?

If it works fine on, say Redhat, then it's hardly a problem in gnubg?

> As mentioned before this doesn't happen with
> debian. The output is available at 
> http://www.acepoint.de/GnuBG/strace_gnubg.tar.gz. I'd be glad if
> someone takes a look at it.

I've no idea on how to interprete the strace output, but one question
came to mind: does the GUI slow on both 2D and 3D boards?

For the mailing list readers:

Would output from gprof be more interesting, i.e., would that reveal
where the additional time is spend? I didn't follow the thread closely,
but as far as I remember Achim said that CPU time was identical, but wall
time was much longer (Achim, can you confirm?)! Will the wall time be
attributed to the correct routine in a gprof experiment?

Jørn

Attachment: pgpeKJAs3ZnlZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]