[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Marked move characters su ggestion
From: |
Massimiliano . Maini |
Subject: |
Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Marked move characters su ggestion |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:44:36 +0200 |
>On Wed 10 Sep 2003 (04:38 -0400), address@hidden wrote:
>> IMHO the marked move characters still don't look easy on the eye so how about
>> this suggestion:
>>
>> Checker play: doubtful/bad/very bad use: p, pp, ppp
>> Cube action doubtful/bad/verybad use: c, cc, ccc
>>
>> It just looks so much easier to read than !???!!!??? etc ;-)
>>
>> It's unfortunate that cube and checker start with the same letter !
>> If you think p isn't appropriate then suggest another letter.
>
>
>Should we just have a options and settings:
>
>set flag cube very bad C
>set flag cube bad c
>set flag cube doubtful c!
>set flag chequer very bad P
>set flag chequer bad p
>set flag chequer doubtful p!
>
>Or alternatively:
>
>set flags cube C c c!
>set flags chequer P p p!
>
>This allows users with other languages to make their own choices
Hmmm,this would basically make annotations unreadable acroos different
users, since sooner or later a "special" user will set the following :
cube very bad D
cube bad VB
cube doubtful B
or any other unreadable permutation (most illogical first).
I have small preferences across different possibilities, but I do
think that a fixed one is better.
MaX.
P.S.
My 2c :
Ian's : 62?? 13/7 13/11??
or : 62 13/7 13/11 (??,??) <-- (cube,chequer)
or : 62 (??,??) 13/7 13/11
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Réf. : Re: [Bug-gnubg] Marked move characters su ggestion,
Massimiliano . Maini <=