[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs
From: |
kvandoel |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:39:37 +0200 (CEST) |
Now that the external player bugs are dead I tried playing some 17pt
matches expert-expert using different met's.
I think the results show that the differences between the mets are
completely negligible in terms of equivalent rating strength points.
Playing 100 17pt matches mec26-woolsey, analyse using woolsey.xml (also
at expert level) I get the follolwing effective ratings for the mec26
table with 2200 being defined as expert level. On average the difference
is a single rating point caused by cube "errors". Of course the expert
level analysis only shows how small the difference between the tables
is.
Let me know if anyone is interested in comparing other met's.
external (mec26) local (woolsey)
external (Average of 100) 2199 +- 0. Moves: 0. Cubes: 1
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2186
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2192
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2197
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2196
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2197
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2196
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2196
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2197
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2193
(local ) 2196
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2197
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2198
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2194
(local ) 2199
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2197
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2200
(local ) 2199
Kees
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/01
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/03
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nardy Pillards, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nardy Pillards, 2003/09/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nardy Pillards, 2003/09/04
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: The importance of METs, Nardy Pillards, 2003/09/02