Re: [Bug-gnubg] Concerning 3d, reply to archive message.

[Joern Thyssen]

On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 02:06:54AM +0200, Marco van Tol wrote
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:42:10AM +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
[snip]
> > The question is why glXIsDirect returns FALSE when glxinfo claims that
> > there is direct rendering?!
> 
> I made a mini-program myself, which may be _completely wrong by design and a
> lot of other things_, but at least it contains a glXIsDirect() call which does
> say rendering is direct.
> (Please note my OpenGL programming experience is 'none', short for this
> mini-program)
> 
> Here is the source code:
> (Reference material was taken from:
> http://tc1.chemie.uni-bielefeld.de/doc/OpenGL/hp/Reference.html)
> 
> Maybe this helps, if not pretend I never sent it. ;)
> 
> If someone can try it on a unix box which does not have DRI, it'd be
> interesting to see if it indeed would output 'No. Not Direct!' ;-)

I have such a machine, and it seems your code works!

I'll see if I can get it to work inside gnubg as well.

Jørn

pgpBsaUuKYy1m.pgp
Description: PGP signature