[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings
From: |
Holger |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Sep 2003 06:16:11 +0200 |
At 14:13 06.09.2003 +1200, Joseph Heled wrote:
If we assume that the calculates ratings are closer to reality, why not
drop the "textual ratings" altogether?
I think they do serve a purpose as they are much easier to grasp,
especially for new people. Personally, I also like to see some text in
between all those numbers. It kind of serves as an anchor and allows at a
very short glance to see whether I played good or bad.
Maybe we should consider adjusting them again.
Regards,
Holger
- [Bug-gnubg] Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Christopher D. Yep, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Christopher D. Yep, 2003/09/10