RE: [Bug-gnubg] Annotating doubles

[Albert Silver]

Ok, thanks for the workaround. I hadn't realized the annotations for the
double and take were separate.

                                                Albert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:bug-gnubg-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Joern Thyssen
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: GNU Backgammon Bugs
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Annotating doubles
> 
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:00:18PM -0300, Albert Silver wrote
> > I did run into another small bug, which I've confirmed several times
> > (and forgot to mention). When I export a commented game, and I add
> > comments to a double that ended the game, the comments appear in the
> > move just *before* the double and not after the double as they
should.
> 
> For a "double, take" or "double, pass" sequence is a match, gnubg
stores
> two records. One for "double" and one for "pass" or "take". When
> exporting to html gnubg ignores the "double" record since it assumes
> it'll be followed by a "take" or "pass" record. When it encounters the
> "take" or "pass" record it'll draw a board and show the cube decision
> equities etc:
> 
> 1. normal move
> 2. normal move
> ...
> 10. double [no output]
> write annotation for double
> 11. take [do output]
> write annotation for take
> ...
> 
> That's why you see the annotation for the double before the actual
board
> and equities.
> 
> I've noted this in my private TODO list. Until it's fixed the only
work
> around is to write the annoations in the "take" or "pass" record.
> 
> Jørn