[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Weights Question
From: |
Albert Silver |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Weights Question |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:14:53 -0300 |
If memory serves, the race net improvement was really an improvement in
the speed it used it, but that the weights themselves are the same.
Albert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:bug-gnubg-
> address@hidden On Behalf Of Morten Wang
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 9:20 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Weights Question
>
> * address@hidden
> > I notice reference to weights 0.13b.
> > Was there a 0.13a and if yes what was the difference and from which
> > build was it changed?
>
> 0.13, a new race net, was notified on 2003-01-06, and then mirrored on
> alpha.gnu.org as gnubg.weights-0.13.gz.
>
> The notification for what was uploaded to alpha.gnu.org as 0.13a was
> sent by Joseph on 2003-01-11. As far as I can understand the
> difference between 0.13 and 0.13a is improvements in the race net.
>
> 0.13b, named 13.1 had its notification sent 2003-02-14, and had a new
> contact net.
>
> I'll have to do some more digging through my mail archive should I
> answer the last question.
>
>
> Morten!
>
> --
> "...a liquid which was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea."
> My opinions are not necessarily those of my provider,
> not necessarily mine, and probably not necessary.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg