Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug tracker: Forwarding of postings

[Joern Thyssen]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:45:13PM +0200, Holger wrote
> At 11:32 27.06.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:06:45PM +0200, Holger wrote
> >> Firstly, I was wondering whether it is in any way different, although I
> >> didn't really suppose it to be. What should be so special about your
> >> address over the list's?
> >
> >The list may filter certain mails, e.g., to exclude malconfigured
> >auto-reponses from people on vacation etc.
> >
> >I noticed the following header:
> >
> >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=4.0
> >
> >meaning that some spam filter rates this mails as being very close to
> >spam.
> 
> Ah, so the problem with the erratic posting is not due to Savannah but our 
> mailing list. 

Well, I checked all the bug reports I've recieved and none of them had
X-Spam-Status = yes. 

But still, if gnu.org has another, more restrictive, filter this could
be the problem, but I'm just guessing...


> Who can configure this? I guess it's enough to set 
> address@hidden on the white list.

Yes, assuming this is possible (and that is, in fact, the problem).

Jørn