[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:54:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:44:16PM -0400, Douglas Zare wrote
> Quoting Joern Thyssen <address@hidden>:
> >
> > Yes, but to get the 95% confidence interval you should devide by the
> > square root of the number of steps (following the discussion last week).
>
> You are comparing apples with oranges.
Yes, after some off-list discussion with Rod we came to the same
conclusion.
I have to dig out my books on statistics :-)
[snip]
> standard deviation should be higher. Since what you have observed is
> much lower, I don't think you have a representative sample.
Since the bot swings between 1900 and 2100 the std.dev. should be around
50?
Unfortunately I've no access to gammonvillage, so I can't follow the
link. Is the article available elsewhere?
Jørn
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/03
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Rod Roark, 2003/06/03
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Rod Roark, 2003/06/04
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Rod Roark, 2003/06/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Rod Roark, 2003/06/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] GnuBG Rocks!, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/12
- [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks, Rod Roark, 2003/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks, Joern Thyssen, 2003/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks, Douglas Zare, 2003/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks,
Joern Thyssen <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks, Rod Roark, 2003/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Ratings as random walks, Nis Jorgensen, 2003/06/16