[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] 1-chequer hypergammon
|
From: |
Ian Shaw |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] 1-chequer hypergammon |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:54:57 +0100 |
> From: Ned> Cross
>
> Hmm, I've never played 1-checker hyper, but it seems to me
> gammons would
> always be equal to wins for both sides by definition.
D'oh! Of course they are. I'd never played 1-checker hyper, either, but you're
obviously much quicker on the uptake than me.
--Ian