[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Market window reports
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Market window reports |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:38:09 -0000 |
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 09:39:13PM -0000, ershaw wrote
> > GNU Backgammon Position ID: xm7gAwjmdsADBA
> > Match ID : cIl1AAAAAAAA
> > +24-23-22-21-20-19------18-17-16-15-14-13-+ O: Opponent
> > | O X O O | | O X | 0 points
> > | O O O | | O X |
> > | O | | X |
> > | | | X |
> > | | | |
> > | |BAR| |v 3 point
> match (Cube: 1)
> > | | | O |
> > | | | O |
> > | X X | | O |
> > | X X X X | | O | Rolled 35
> > | X O X X X | | O | 0 points
> > +-1--2--3--4--5--6-------7--8--9-10-11-12-+ X: ian
> >
> >
> >
> > The market window table reports my Too Good Point as
> 68.612%. (There is no Copy function on this window, BTW)
> > The 2-ply cube analysis reports the proper cube action as
> Double/Pass, even though I am over the Too Good point. This
> seems inconsistent to me.
> >
> > Cube analysis
> > 2-ply cubeless equity +0.742 (Money: +0.630)
> > 0.705 0.288 0.004 - 0.295 0.069 0.003
> > 1. Double, pass +1.000
> > 2. Double, take +1.292 ( +0.292)
> > 3. No double +0.857 ( -0.143)
> > Proper cube action: Double, pass
>
> First, gnubg uses a 0-ply evaluation for the market window.
> Second, the
> 68.6% you report is for a fully live cube, whereas the too
> good point is
> 82.758% for a dead cube.
>
> 0-ply reports:
>
> Win W(g) W(bg) L(g) L(bg) Mwc
> 0.692 0.282 0.003 0.072 0.002 57.01%
>
> Double, pass : 60.00%
> Double, take : 61.85% ( +1.85%)
> No double : 59.12% ( -0.88%)
>
> Correct cube action: Double, pass
>
>
> Since 69.2% > 68.6% you're in the good too window. Now, gnubg
> extrapolates your mwc between (68.6%,60%) (you cash one point) and
> (100%,66.22%) (you win the game with the current gammon ratios).
>
> WIth p = 69.2% you get: 60.11% which is your equity with a fully live
> cube.
>
> Your dead cube equity is 57.01%.
>
> Your final equity is: 0.32 * 57.01% + 0.68 * 60.11 = 59.12% which is
> what gnubg reports above as the equity for not doubling.
>
> As 59.12% is lower than the equity for doubling the position is a
> double.
>
> Of course, 2-ply is more complicated since it's an average over many
> positions and cube values and ownerships.
>
> Jørn
>
Whoa! That's a pretty tricky explanation. I'll have to study it more if I'm
going to understand it completely. I think the gist of it is that I was looking
at the Live Cube number and not realising that it represents 100% cube
efficiency. Since 100% cube efficiency is rare, I need to extrapolate between
the dead & live cube numbers.
--Ian