RE: [Bug-gnubg] MAT import issues

[Albert Silver]

I asked a friend yesterday and he laughed saying there is no take or
pass with beavers. If I beaver your double, that's that. Snowie and TMG
confirm this by offering no option to take or pass when beavering. Same
with raccoons, but I'll check at GG later since I never played with them
neither TMG, nor Snowie have raccoons. 

BTW, you said that it doesn't analyze beavers. Is that why it didn't
flag an error on my beaver, but did flag a blunder for his initial
double?

                                        Albert

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Joern Thyssen
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 5:29 AM
To: Ned Cross
Cc: 'GNUBackgammon bug reporting'; Albert Silver
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] MAT import issues

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:22:26AM -0800, Ned Cross wrote
> If GNUbg can be made to understand beavers in .mat files, can it also
be
> made to understand them in .sgg files as well?

Most likely, if you can email me some examples:

(1) double, beaver, take
(2) double, beaver, drop
(3) double, beaver, raccoon, drop
(4) double, beaver, raccoon, take

You can start by sending me example (1). If the SGG format is
well-behaved then I might be able to deduce (2), (3), and (4) from it,
but if it's ill-behaved like TMG .mat, I might need an example of (2),
(3), and (4) as well.


WARNING! gnubg does not *analyse* beavers!

Jørn


_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg