Re: [Bug-gnubg] Minor rollout setting patches

[Jim Segrave]

On Mon 18 Nov 2002 (21:51 +0100), Jim Segrave wrote:
> On Mon 18 Nov 2002 (19:24 +0000), Joern Thyssen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:23:59PM +0100, Jim Segrave wrote
> > > On Mon 18 Nov 2002 (09:12 +0000), Joern Thyssen wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > I suggest you open an account on savannah.gnu.org. I'll give to write
> > > > access to CVS if you send me your user ID.
> > > 
> > > OK - I've created an account with username jsegrave and put my ssh
> > > keys up (though I'll have to wait a while for them to be installed,
> > > then see if they work).
> > 
> > I've added you to the project, so you should have write access to CVS.
> > 
> > There are some instructions on
> > <URL:https://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=gnubg>.
> 
> I'll see if it works tonight or tomorrow.

It does work.
I've commited the rollout fixes from this weekend and the colour
selection patch as outlined below.

I haven't committed the changes to rotate-rolls code - I'd like other
opinions on whether it's a good idea or not.

I also just noticed something not so good - I normally always do a
build to ensure that everything is still clean, followed by a 'commit
.' - force of habit from our CVS at work, to ensure nothing gets
overlooked and not committed. 

Unfortunately this led to commiting the Makefile.in & similar files
which are . Does someone with admin rights want to delete those
updates (I've only been committing .c and .h files)? From a few random
cvs diff -u, it looks like it's mostly the autoconf.h comment that
changed, but there's really no reason to have an updated revision.

-- 
Jim Segrave           address@hidden