Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Profiler output

[Joseph Heled]

I would repeat the EqualKeys inlining under 3.1 or 3.2

It's optimization is so much better.

-Joseph


Jim Segrave wrote:
> On Tue 12 Nov 2002 (06:16 +1300), Joseph Heled wrote:
>
> > Jim Segrave wrote:
> >
> > > Interestingly, both the profiler and running unprofiled code show that
> > > inlining EqualKeys() actually is a slight performance loss.(about 2%
> > > slower over the same 376 move analysis). I am guessing that it might
> > > stop some other optimisations.
> >
> > Interesting. Are you using gcc 3.1 or 3.2?
>
>
> address@hidden:/usr/local/src/gnubg.prof# gcc --version
> 2.95.4