Re: [Bug-gnubg] gcc 3.1

[Joseph Heled]

"Steve J. Baedke" wrote:
> 
> So far so good.  I'm not getting as much improvement as 33%, what I'm
> seeing is about 15-20% on various tasks so far (analyzing matches,
> rollouts of cube decisions and checker play).
> 
> I haven't run into any problems yet and so I think it is fairly stable.
>   I'll keep playing around.
> 
> Can sagnubg.exe be recompiled as well?
> 
> steve
> 
> Øystein O Johansen wrote:
> 
> >>I got a speed improvement of 33% for net evaluations
> >>(on my intel PIII).
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've successfully (?) compiled our little baby with gcc 3.1 for windows. I
> > hvae not tested anything for speed improvements. If somebody using Windows
> > can do a small test for speed and stability, I would be very thankful.
> >
> > Ian... Zorba... Steve... max-d... Nardy...or anyone else?
> >
> > <URL:http://home.online.no/~oeysteij/gnubg-gcc31.exe>
> >
> > -Øystein
> >
 
I explicitly said "net evaluations". Overall the saving is less, but you should
see something like the 30% when sagnubg is concerned.

-Joseph