[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?
From: |
Gary Wong |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 15:49:29 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 07:41:27PM +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> However, I'm quite unsure whether libgen.h is standard or not?!
>
> Does anyone know?
The GNU libc documentation (libc.info) mentions that the GNU basename
function is prototyped in string.h, and that libgen.h is the XPG
basename. So I presume that basename comes from X/Open, and
unfortunately won't be standard outside Un*x systems.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary Wong address@hidden http://www.cs.arizona.edu/~gary/
- [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?,
Gary Wong <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Jim Segrave, 2002/08/06
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Øystein Johansen, 2002/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/07
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joseph Heled, 2002/08/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] libgen.h?, Joern Thyssen, 2002/08/11