Re: Unexpected result while constructing strings

[Davide Brini]

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:43:28 +0200 Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
wrote:

> Davide Brini <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > That would explain the leading 0 (FS converted to number before the
> > postincrement). Still, it seems weird to me that "FS ++c" is parsed
> > as being a postincrement for FS, despite the intervening space.
> 
> Spaces are only significant as being token separators, but otherwise
> ignored.

I was just rereading the grammar more accurately now, and I found that in
the "lexical conventions" listed after the grammar. Thanks.

-- 
D.