[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: might be a bug in gawk
From: |
Micah Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: might be a bug in gawk |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:28:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Dave B <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>>> There is no formatting directive that reqires an argument. %28b is
>>> unknown and %29% is treated the same as %%.
>> Where is that documented?
>
> Nowhere. Both are undefined.
To be pedantic, %29% is not undefined, AFAICT: % is an ordinary
conversion specifier, and I don't see anything anywhere that says it
can't take a field width (but neither would I particularly expect
real-world implementations to behave appropriately with them).
- --
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer.
Maintainer of GNU Wget and GNU Teseq
http://micah.cowan.name/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknKd7IACgkQ7M8hyUobTrHG8gCeMniq6BVvGKgvyqnaexIo9jzH
RpIAniwvthJiMeGE2gC8Y0QvBuwaF/j6
=5vg4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: might be a bug in gawk, Jean-Michel ELYN, 2009/03/26
Re: might be a bug in gawk, Pierre Gaston, 2009/03/26