[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug w/ gawk stat extension
|
From: |
Andrew J. Schorr |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bug w/ gawk stat extension |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:58:30 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:47:08AM -0400, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> But does it make sense to truncate the link value silently in that case?
> Wouldn't it be better simply to omit the "linkval" field from the
> array instead of returning an incorrect value?
So, in other words, perhaps something like the attached patch?
Regards,
Andy
filefuncs.patch
Description: Text document
- Bug w/ gawk tat extension, Glenn Zazulia, 2005/06/19
- Re: Bug w/ gawk tat extension, Aharon Robbins, 2005/06/20
- Re: Bug w/ gawk stat extension, Glenn Zazulia, 2005/06/22
- Re: Bug w/ gawk stat extension, Jim Meyering, 2005/06/22
- Re: Bug w/ gawk stat extension, Andrew J. Schorr, 2005/06/22
- Re: Bug w/ gawk stat extension, Jim Meyering, 2005/06/22