Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug

[John Darrington]

I'll take a look at it.

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:17:17AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     That seems bad.  "1.00" and NaN are pretty different.  Do you
     think it's worth looking into the calculations, or should we just
     ignore this difference as we have others?
     
     John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
     
     > My system fails the new test:
     >
     > 395. factor.at:1803: testing FACTOR /ROTATION=NOROTATE ...
     > ../../tests/factor.at:1821: pspp -O format=csv factor-norotate.sps
     > --- -   2012-04-04 11:18:24.388115600 +0100
     > +++ 
/home/Darringt/.p/P/UTP_00/ClearQuest/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/395/stdout  
    2012-04-04 11:18:23.366814100 +0100
     > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
     >  TRAIT5,7.29,2.66,7
     >  
     >  Table: KMO and Bartlett's Test
     > -Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy,,1.00
     > +Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy,,NaN
     >  Bartlett's Test of Sphericity,Approx. Chi-Square,NaN
     >  ,df,10
     >  ,Sig.,NaN
     > 395. factor.at:1803:  FAILED (factor.at:1821)
     >
     >
     > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:00:28PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
     >      Thank you very much for the bug report.  I reproduced the bug and
     >      fixed this on the PSPP "master" branch.
     >      -- 
     >      Ben Pfaff 
     >      http://benpfaff.org
     >      
     >      _______________________________________________
     >      Bug-gnu-pspp mailing list
     >      address@hidden
     >      https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-pspp
     
     -- 
     Ben Pfaff 
     http://benpfaff.org

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://keys.gnupg.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature