Re: [bug-gnu-libiconv] Including libiconv in another package

[Reuben Thomas]

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 00:03, Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> wrote:

We cannot do efficient communication this way, if all you give me is a
certain git branch in the 'recode' repository and a CI's log file.

Sorry about that.

What I'm missing is the tarball that was being configured in your CI.

There was no tarball, it was checking out, bootstrapping and configuring the git branch.

However, an equivalent tarball can be fetched: https://github.com/rrthomas/recode/archive/refs/heads/static-iconv.tar.gz

If you would prefer a tarball that definitely matches a particular commit, you can use:

https://github.com/rrthomas/recode/archive/COMMITID.tar.gz

Does that work? Or if you prefer, I can generate ad-hoc dist tarballs for particular commits.

--

https://rrt.sc3d.org