Re: [bug-gnu-libiconv] Solaris libiconv vs. GNU libiconv in terms of 646

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Bruno,

Am 28.02.2008 um 01:37 schrieb Bruno Haible:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> > I am currently packaging zsh for Solaris when I noticed
> > some failing tests due to problems with libiconv.
> > It looks like Solaris uses 646 as standard which is
> > known to Solaris libiconv but not GNU libiconv.
>
> This situation has been addressed in full generality - there is not  
> only
> Solaris and "646", there is also HP-UX and "hp15CN", and many others -
> in the gnulib module 'iconv_open', here:

As I understand it there should be an encodings_solaris.def similar
to the files for osf1 and aix with the mappings from charset.alias
or am I getting something completely wrong here?

Best regards

  -- Dagobert