[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo
From: |
Paul D. Nelson |
Subject: |
bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Apr 2025 07:43:40 +0200 |
> Thanks for clarifying. So your thought is that the first two bullet
> points in your original mail are covered by the command as-is?
Yes. A key justification in my view is that these uses compound with
all commands (in Emacs or external) that substantially modify a buffer.
>>> Of your suggestions here, my first thought is that maybe C-x x g could
>>> start operating only on an active region, if there is one. That seems
>>> like a great new feature.
>>
>> Yes, that sounds excellent.
>
> If you would be interested in working on that, I'd be very happy to
> review and shepherd the change.
Thanks, sounds good (although happy if others want to try, too). A
related idea is to make vc-diff restrict to hunks in the active region
(in the "without arg" case). Does that sound to you like a good change?
bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Michael Heerdegen, 2025/04/09
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Sean Whitton, 2025/04/09
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Paul D. Nelson, 2025/04/09
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Sean Whitton, 2025/04/09
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Paul D. Nelson, 2025/04/10
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Sean Whitton, 2025/04/10
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Michael Heerdegen, 2025/04/10
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Sean Whitton, 2025/04/11
- bug#77580: [PATCH] New command ediff-undo, Paul D. Nelson, 2025/04/12