[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74281: 30.0.91; font-lock mode hangs on scrolling large Scheme file
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#74281: 30.0.91; font-lock mode hangs on scrolling large Scheme file |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:56:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> Stefan, what tools do we have to investigate slowness related to
> parse-partial-sexp? Or maybe you have suggestions for how to speed up
> font-lock in this case?
Hmm... `parse-partial-sexp` is normally expected to be fast, unless it
has to scan a lot of text.
> Here's the profile I get while moving with C-p through the above file:
A stab in the dark, but maybe the relevant call is the one in:
(state (if (or syntax-ppss-table
(not font-lock--syntax-table-affects-ppss))
(syntax-ppss start)
;; If `syntax-ppss' doesn't have its own syntax-table and
;; we have installed our own syntax-table which
;; differs from the standard one in ways which affects PPSS,
;; then we can't use `syntax-ppss' since that would pollute
;; and be polluted by its cache.
(parse-partial-sexp (point-min) start)))
so the origin of the slowdown would be the (?#. "w 14") in the setting
below in `scheme.el`:
(setq font-lock-defaults
'((scheme-font-lock-keywords
scheme-font-lock-keywords-1 scheme-font-lock-keywords-2)
nil t (("+-*/.<>=!?$%_&~^:" . "w") (?#. "w 14"))
beginning-of-defun
(font-lock-mark-block-function . mark-defun)))
in which case, setting a `syntax-ppss-table` should fix the problem, tho
we could also fix it by being more careful: AFAICT the purpose of this
(?#. "w 14") is only to change the syntax of `#` from "prefix" to "word"
without changing the comment-related flags, so it shouldn't cause
`font-lock--syntax-table-affects-ppss` to be set.
So, we could solve it by improving the code that sets
`font-lock--syntax-table-affects-ppss`, as in the patch below.
Stefan
diff --git a/lisp/font-lock.el b/lisp/font-lock.el
index 203131bfd5a..f6299920c0a 100644
--- a/lisp/font-lock.el
+++ b/lisp/font-lock.el
@@ -1955,14 +1955,15 @@ font-lock-set-defaults
(dolist (char (if (numberp (car selem))
(list (car selem))
(mapcar #'identity (car selem))))
- (unless (memq (car (aref font-lock-syntax-table char))
- '(1 2 3)) ;"." "w" "_"
- (setq font-lock--syntax-table-affects-ppss t))
- (modify-syntax-entry char syntax font-lock-syntax-table)
- (unless (memq (car (aref font-lock-syntax-table char))
- '(1 2 3)) ;"." "w" "_"
- (setq font-lock--syntax-table-affects-ppss t))
- ))))
+ (let ((old-syntax (aref font-lock-syntax-table char)))
+ (modify-syntax-entry char syntax font-lock-syntax-table)
+ (let ((new-syntax (aref font-lock-syntax-table char)))
+ (unless (and (equal (cdr old-syntax) (cdr new-syntax))
+ (memq (logand (car old-syntax) 255) '(1 2 3 6))
+ (memq (logand (car new-syntax) 255) '(1 2 3 6))
+ (equal (ash (car old-syntax) -8)
+ (ash (car new-syntax) -8)))
+ (setq font-lock--syntax-table-affects-ppss t))))))))
;; (nth 4 defaults) used to hold
`font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function',
;; but that was removed in 25.1, so if it's a cons cell, we assume that
;; it's part of the variable alist.