[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#71861: 31.0.50; Keep better track of options to be :set-after others
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
bug#71861: 31.0.50; Keep better track of options to be :set-after others |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:00:35 +0000 |
Sorry for the delay,
Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec@gmail.com> writes:
> Assisting maintainers by automating some of that would be neat. I have
> some half-baked ideas on the topic, but I'll tuck them in a footnote¹
> and let Philip tell us about his own 😉
The simplest solution is to provide a variadic function that would call
`custom-reevaluate-setting' + perhaps some additional checks to avoid an
issue like in bug#72077. I feel that this would be the simplest option
that wouldn't require fiddling with defcustom internals. We can
document what :initialize to use as well (thought I'm guessing it would
be `custom-initialize-changed' most of the time).
--
Philip Kaludercic on peregrine
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#71861: 31.0.50; Keep better track of options to be :set-after others,
Philip Kaludercic <=