|
From: | Jostein Kjønigsen |
Subject: | bug#59691: Html-like constructs fail in typescript |
Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:59:20 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 |
On 29.11.2022 23:20, Jostein Kjønigsen wrote:On 29 Nov 2022, at 22:48, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote: On 29 November 2022 22:37:25 CET, "Jostein Kjønigsen" <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net> wrote: Nice! Should we until further notice assume that js-ts-mode suffers from the same issues, and that a jsx-ts-mode might be needed too? To me it at least sounds plausible.No, because there are no ambiguities in the grammar with types and jsx.Note this behaviour was triggered even when a HTML-tag was contained inside a plain string. Even without hard typescript casts, there are places where I suspect the same issues can bleed into js-ts-mode. I’ll try to do more testing tomorrow. First of all - good news! Contrary to my expectations, I've tested and I cannot reproduce this issue in js-ts-mode. Even more good news: Looking deeper into this using treesit-explorer-mode (an extremely helpful tool, Yuan!), I found I may have misinterpreted the state of the parse-tree in previous report. Based on that, I would like to revise this bug report:
Also, reading up, from what I can tell "hard casts" using angle-brackets are no longer encouraged as the default way to cast: const service = <IService>object; This is because the above code will cause a compiler error if used in TSX-files (as opposed to TS-files). Instead "as" expressions are preferred, because they work equally well for both TS & TSX-files: const service = object as IService; That means that writing idiomatic TypeScript with typescrip-ts-mode should produce the expected behaviour, while one may encounter issues with older code. I'm not sure introducing a new major-mode for this 1 aspect of TypeScript development is worth it? Does anyone else have an opinion on this? Jostein |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |