bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Pankaj Jangid <pankaj@codeisgreat.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  "M. Ian Graham"
>  <hello+emacs@miangraham.com>,  59214@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:43:02 +0530
> 
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> FWIW, I think Rust is too crazy for us to follow its daily changes and
> >> offer support for its server OOTB in eglot-server-programs.  Emacs is
> >> not equipped to follow such frequent and radical changes.  If we want
> >> to make this seamless for users of Rust, we should provide a special
> >> command to update eglot-server-programs with whatever it is the latest
> >> Rust fashion.  Or maybe we should even leave that to Rust mode.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, indeed, my thoughts exactly, especially this last bit.
> >
> 
> Agree.
> 
> And thank you, Ian, for bringing up the counter thoughts in the
> discussion. It was an eye opener for me. I was thinking `rustup' is the
> only way to use `rust'.

So what's the bottom line here?  Do we need to make any change in
eglot.el, and if so, what change is that?