[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added
From: |
Pankaj Jangid |
Subject: |
bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:02:52 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> So rustup is just an optional way of installing rust-analyzer? If so I
> think we shouldn't
> tweak this.
It may be optional, but it is *the* official method advertised in the
docs. Other methods are categorised as, as expected, "Other Installation
Methods".
> (tangent: rustup being optional is intriguing and interesting. If I wanted
> to learn Rust, just Rust, should I start with a rustup-less setup?)
I would recommend `rustup'. Rust is a fast moving language and other
installation methods are not officially maintained. And distribution
providers may have a delay of few days before pushing latest release.
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, (continued)
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, João Távora, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, M. Ian Graham, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, João Távora, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, M. Ian Graham, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added, João Távora, 2022/11/17
- bug#59214: [PATCH] Alternate rust-analyzer command added,
Pankaj Jangid <=