On 01.11.2022 21:36, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
I believe this is preferable to fixing `show-paren-predicate', as this
is the kind of issue a lot of people could trip over.
This patch is based on the patch from bug#58950, but can be
back-ported
to the previous implementations if there are any issues with that report.
I do agree that (not foo) is more convenient than (not . foo). Though
the latter would be more regular compared to the rest of the syntax. I
made just that mistake yesterday.
Let's change 'pcase' to 'pcase-exhaustive', though? So it will signal
an error on invalid syntax.