[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayabl
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:44:06 +0800 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> If the terminal's encoding is UTF-8, and it doesn't support the method
> we use to query about individual glyphs, char-displayable-p may return
> non-nil when the character cannot be displayed, i.e. will show as an
> empty box or something. Otherwise, char-displayable-p does provide
> the correct answer for TTY frames.
Do I understand correctly that:
1. `font-at' is not sufficient for terminals, and we also need to use
`char-displayable-p'
2. `char-displayable-p' works on many terminals but may be inaccurate in some
--
Ihor Radchenko,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at https://orgmode.org/.
Support Org development at https://liberapay.com/org-mode,
or support my work at https://liberapay.com/yantar92
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, (continued)
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/10
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/10
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/10
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/10
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/10
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/11
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/11
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/11
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/12
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/12
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/13
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/13
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/13
- bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/09/12
bug#57693: 29.0.50; Is there a more reliable version of `char-displayable-p'?, Robert Pluim, 2022/09/09