[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2022 14:29:13 +0300 |
> Cc: 57727@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:33:12 +0200
>
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
> > That seems a bit over-engineered to me.
> > Why not just a DEVAR_BOOL to control whether we flush or not?
>
> Ok. My thoughts went like so:
FWIW, I don't think this is over-engineered. The suspend/resume dance
caused me to raise a brow, but I guess you cannot otherwise reset the
terminal settings?
> 2. I don't believe that just avoiding fflush will be enough. THe code
> currently uses a buffer of size BUFSIZ, which is OS-specific. On my
> system, for instance, BUFSIZ = 1024. Don't know about MS-Windows today,
> but I remember it being 512 there at some time.
It's still 512. But buffered stdio functions in the MS-Windows
runtime use 4K buffers, AFAIK, not 512B buffers.
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/09/11
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/11
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/11
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/12
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/09/13
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/09/13
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/09/13
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/09/13
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Stefan Monnier, 2022/09/13
- bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/09/13
bug#57727: 29.0.50; Optimize tty display updates, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/09/17