[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-
From: |
uzibalqa |
Subject: |
bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode. |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:05:14 +0000 |
------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, August 30th, 2022 at 2:16 AM, Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:
> Following up my own comment, grepping the codebase for
> define-derived-mode definitions would require multiple
> passes (in order to establish chains of derivatives leading
> back to prog-mode), so "loading all the things" and testing
> in elisp seems simpler after all.
It is.
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., (continued)
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Gregory Heytings, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Christopher Dimech, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Gregory Heytings, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Christopher Dimech, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., uzibalqa, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., uzibalqa, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Phil Sainty, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode., Phil Sainty, 2022/08/29
- bug#57469: Missing information about all the modes that fall under prog-mode.,
uzibalqa <=