bug#50499: 28.0.50; project.el: Root of current project

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:

> Okay, introducing a new name is probably not worth the trouble for such
> a small benefit.  Only if it was possible/easy to overload the existing
> function (and make it analogous the typical “&optional BUFFER” kind of
> argument) would there be a gain in it, I think.

(I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately weren't resolved
at the time.)

If I understand correctly, the conclusion here was that we don't want to
do this, so I'm closing this bug report.  If I misunderstood, please
respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen.