bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#50258: Don't call (vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge) [svn/cvs


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#50258: Don't call (vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge) [svn/cvs/rcs]
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 02:28:36 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1

On 22.08.2022 19:00, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
Dmitry Gutov<dgutov@yandex.ru>  writes:

vc-merge should call (vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge-file) instead.

The change is trivial, but someone with any of the VCS listed above
installed should test it.
I could test it -- did you have any particular test scenario in mind?
Or are there test cases for this in vc-tests.el?

No, no tests.

A scenario would be some situation where using vc-merge makes sense.

I don't really remember how branches worked in SVN, much less CVS or RCS to write this step by step.

Maybe testing is not even necessary: the change I'm proposing seems like a no-brainer, it just removes the requirement for the 'merge' backend methods to be defined (in per-file backends). No code uses them directly anyway.

diff --git a/lisp/vc/vc.el b/lisp/vc/vc.el
index d3e53858c1..3274f1ec9d 100644
--- a/lisp/vc/vc.el
+++ b/lisp/vc/vc.el
@@ -2294,7 +2294,7 @@ vc-merge
      ((vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge-branch)
       (vc-call-backend backend 'merge-branch))
      ;; Otherwise, do a per-file merge.
-     ((vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge)
+     ((vc-find-backend-function backend 'merge-file)
       (vc-buffer-sync)
       (dolist (file files)
        (let* ((state (vc-state file))





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]