[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2022 22:25:44 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>, michael_heerdegen@web.de,
> 45607@debbugs.gnu.org, darkfeline@felesatra.moe
> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:15:51 +0200
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Bonus points for calling use-region-p just once, not twice.
>
> I don't really see a convenient way to do that in these cases -- the
> only ones I could think of (adding a new function to return both
> start/end, and then splice the results in into the `interactive' specs
> etc) would lead to obfuscated code.
What about cl-destructuring-bind and its ilk?
> (And it's not like this is performance critical anyway.)
It's IMO inelegant to make the same test twice in a row.
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/08
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/09
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Juri Linkov, 2022/08/09
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/12
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Juri Linkov, 2022/08/12
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/13
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Juri Linkov, 2022/08/13
- bug#45607: 27.1; compiled replace-string breaks repeat-complex-command, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/08/15