bug#57079: 29.0.50; Performance of seq-uniq is not very good

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> My point is that it will never be as fast as the implementations
> Stefan deleted, replacing them with seq-uniq.  My point is that those
> changes just made several places in Emacs slower, even after your
> speedup, for no good reason.  Those deleted functions, if they needed
> to be deleted, should have been replaced by a different
> implementation, which doesn't support TESTFN and is therefore faster,
> as the original implementations, now deleted, were.

The performance of the new seq-uniq (called with no TESTFN) is identical
to the old gnus-delete-duplicates -- it's the same code.