bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#56967: 29.0.50; Frequent crashes under Wayland


From: Bjoern Bidar
Subject: bug#56967: 29.0.50; Frequent crashes under Wayland
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:56:19 +0300

Am Montag, 8. August 2022, 05:40:30 EEST schrieb Po Lu:
> Bjoern Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> writes:
> > I did I had my hole session running, nothing else had that issue.
> > I kept the GTK-Demo running nothing happened it ran just fine.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > After a few hours Emacs exited with the same behaviour as explained in the
> > bug.
> 
> Do you see the same if you run Emacs as something other a daemon?
> 
> > I on the #gtk channel on what do and I got from ebassi that it is ok to
> > just call _exit.
> > He says it might be the client behaving wrong:
> > <ebassi> Thaodan: It could happen because the client made an invalid
> > request— Wayland mandates that the display server closes the connection
> > in that case
> We don't make raw Wayland requests anywhere, so it must be a bug in GTK.

What could be the way that GTK is used or is emacs with pgtk 99% a run of the 
mill gtk app?

> > <ebassi> And if you lose the socket then you'
> > <ebassi> you'll have to find the new one and reconnect
> > <ebassi> Thaodan: Only emacs does that
> > <ebassi> Pretty much literally
> > <Thaodan> "that"?
> > <ebassi> "app may run longer or before the compositor starts"
> > <ebassi> Because emacs is really a 1980s teletype app
> > <Thaodan> What does that change? calling _exit is not a solution.
> > <Thaodan> Lets assume the fault for this happening is emacs, what could
> > cause this?
> 
> Outdated information.  The PGTK port of Emacs doesn't do anything close
> to that, because GTK doesn't let us.
> 
> > <ebassi> Calling exit is perfectly acceptable: the display connection is
> > severed, and that can happen for multiple reasons, including the display
> > server going away
> > <ebassi> There's no "the display server is still running, but it closed
> > the
> > socket" mechanism for the toolkit to use
> 
> So why not use exit, which lets the atexit handlers run?

I don't know, can  someone ask? I feel like these people act like douches when 
some random person asks.

> > <ebassi> The socket got closed
> > <ebassi> The toolkit terminates
> > <ebassi> Thaodan: It could happen because the client made an invalid
> > request— Wayland mandates that the display server closes the connection
> > in that case <ebassi> Or the display server decided to kill the client
> > because it was unresponsive
> > <Thaodan> Why should the toolkit/lib call exit isn't there any better
> > mechanism to doing such a thing in glib or gtk for that matter?
> > <Thaodan> It would be better to not need any hacks to prevent gtk from
> > killing apps.
> > <ebassi> Thaodan: There is no such mechanism
> > <Thaodan> ebassi: OK so what's the idea behind using _exit as a mechanism,
> > doesn't that break any other app that has state so safe too? like for
> > example an office application that wants to safe it's data before going
> > down. <ebassi> I already told you
> > <ebassi> If the display connection is closed by the server, then there's
> > no
> > safe way to store the data
> 
> Store the data that is in Emacs core??  How did these people learn to
> write software?

I guess they did but learned that they are always right when there's an issue? 
Idk.









reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]