[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46621: Copy line
From: |
Sean Whitton |
Subject: |
bug#46621: Copy line |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:37:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.36 Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hello,
On Thu 23 Jun 2022 at 10:00am -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu 23 Jun 2022 at 08:47am +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>>> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
>>> Cc: 46621@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
>>> From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
>>> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:44:31 -0700
>>>
>>> Just to put it out there, if the result of the current discussion is
>>> that point is left at the beginning of the upper of the two lines, then
>>> using it would feel like using C-o, so duplicate-line could go on M-o.
>>
>> Which will be one more blow to those who don't want to lose facemenu,
>> to whom we told just one major release ago they can get the old
>> behavior back by binding M-o to facemenu-keymap. If we usurp M-o now,
>> that recipe in NEWS.28 will no longer be completely accurate.
>>
>> Full disclosure: I'm one of those who happen to like facemenu-keymap
>> on M-o.
>
> Maybe it would be good to add M-o to the list of keys explicitly
> reserved to end users, in that case?
Sorry, re-reading, I think you're saying you think it should remain
unbound for longer but not necessarily indefinitely. In which case it
doesn't make sense to add it to the keybinding conventions.
--
Sean Whitton
- bug#46621: Copy line, (continued)
bug#46621: Copy line, Sean Whitton, 2022/06/22
bug#46621: Copy line, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/23
bug#46621: Copy line, Sean Whitton, 2022/06/23
bug#46621: Copy line,
Sean Whitton <=
bug#46621: Copy line, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/23
bug#46621: Copy line, Sean Whitton, 2022/06/30