[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#46621: Copy line
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#46621: Copy line |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jun 2022 11:26:18 +0200 |
19 juni 2022 kl. 17.22 skrev Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>:
> No, it's consistent -- it always creates a new line.
Either behaviour can be seen as consistent. I suppose it's a matter of what
behaviour we find more convenient.
It's expected to be a rare case and I have no strong opinion about it.
> It's edgy compared to what it's supposed to be doing -- duplicating
> lines.
Well, now it does more. Do you mean that you prefer it wouldn't, or that we
change the name?
I have no strong opinion about the name but it would be a shame to make the
command less useful.
Here is an updated patch that fixes a bug in the original code (would crash
when called without an argument) and adds tests.
0001-Make-duplicate-line-work-on-regions-bug-46621.patch
Description: Binary data
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/17
- bug#46621: Copy line, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/06/18
- bug#46621: Copy line, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/18
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/19
- bug#46621: Copy line, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/06/19
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/19
- bug#46621: Copy line,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/21
- bug#46621: Copy line, Mattias Engdegård, 2022/06/21
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/22
- bug#46621: Copy line, Juri Linkov, 2022/06/21
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/22
- bug#46621: Copy line, Juri Linkov, 2022/06/22
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/22
- bug#46621: Copy line, Pankaj Jangid, 2022/06/22
- bug#46621: Copy line, Juri Linkov, 2022/06/22
- bug#46621: Copy line, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/06/22