[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:50:19 +0300 |
> From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh <lumarzeli30@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:04:43 +0530
> Cc: 55869@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> I am sorry, I do not understand the question, I have not used a
> transliterated name for the Lepcha script.
>
> If you are asking whether to use ᰛᰩᰵ (Róng) or ᰛᰩᰵᰛᰧᰵᰶ (Róng-ríng), I think
> both are fine.
Yes, that is my question. I understand that both are probably fine,
but I'm asking whether we should use what appears on two widely-used
sites. IOW, why prefer the version that doesn't appear there, if both
versions are equally correct?
> The omniglot website also describes other name for this script:
>
> The Lepcha script is known as ᰀᰂ (kakha - the first two letters), ᰇᰨᰕᰧᰵᰶ
> (chomíng - "written
> letters") or ᰕᰧᰵᰶᰙᰳ (míngzât - "treasure of letters").
Yes, but Wikipedia doesn't, so I think Róng-ríng wins here.
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/06/09
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/11
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/06/11
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/11
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/06/11
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/06/11
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/11
- bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script, समीर सिंह Sameer Singh, 2022/06/11