bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>   . The result:
>
>      ((closure (t) nil (setq flyspell-generic-check-word-p 
> 'mail-mode-flyspell-verify)))
>
> Why are we present a simple lambda as a closure? why confuse users
> with something tricky instead of showing the lambda-form the user
> typed?

I'm not sure what you're suggesting here.  The key is bound to a
closure, so that's what Emacs is showing.  (If you switch
lexical-binding off in *scratch* it won't be.)

Do you mean that it shouldn't be a closure if the environment is just t?
I'm not sure what the repercussions of that would be.  Stefan?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no