bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Cc: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>,  51883@debbugs.gnu.org,
>   michael_heerdegen@web.de
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 19:06:06 +0200
> 
> >> +    (bindings--define-key menu [undelete-last-deleted-frame]
> >> +      '(menu-item "Undelete Frame" undelete-frame
> >> +                  :enable undelete-frame-mode
> >> +                  :help "Undelete last deleted frame"))
> >
> > How about using "restore" instead of "undelete", here and everywhere
> > else?  I think it's a tad more clear, and also easier to understand,
> > as it doesn't use negative tense.
> 
> Michael pointed out that "restore" is a too confusing name
> where "restore" is opposite to making a frame fullscreen.

And I raised a brow when reading that.  "Restore" is a very far cry
from "fullscreen".  OTOH, browsers that keep history use "restore", so
I thought it will be a better terminology here.

> OTOH, "undelete" is similar to "undo", so "undelete" better explains
> what it does.

The difference is that "undo" is widely accepted terminology for what
that does.

> And the main advantage of the name "undelete-frame" is that it's
> immediately clear that it's opposite to "delete-frame".

But undelete-frame (the command) is NOT the opposite of delete-frame,
because it doesn't just delete the last frame you deleted.

Anyway, I don't intend to argue more; if you are unhappy with my
proposal, so be it.