bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#51497: 29.0.50; (vc-print-log) broken over TRAMP


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#51497: 29.0.50; (vc-print-log) broken over TRAMP
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 22:44:55 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

On 06.11.2021 18:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: 51497@debbugs.gnu.org, Wolfgang Scherer <wolfgang.scherer@gmx.de>,
  Dima Kogan <lists@dima.secretsauce.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 16:22:56 +0300

On 03.11.2021 15:06, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
Lars, Eli, can we put it in Emacs 28?

Ping.

Sorry for missing the original question.

I'm a bit worried by the function relying on the fact that
default-directory is the directory of the repository.  Wouldn't it be
better to explicitly let-bind it inside the function?

We could, but notice how most of vc-git-* functions don't bind default-directory, thus relying on its implicit value. It just how VC works: expecting default-directory to have the right value around the calls.

The only current caller of vc-git--program-version (vc-git-state) does not either. The backend methods that do, seem to do that with some additional purpose (like having default-directory point to the repository root, rather than be a random directory inside it).

A (perhaps safer) alternative for emacs-28 would be not to use
:(literal) for remote repositories.  What are the disadvantages of
that?

That would mean leaving bug#39452 unfixed on remote hosts. Seems like a significant disadvantage to me (inconsistent behavior leads to more difficult reproduction and reporting of bugs, in particular for those who will notice this problem remotely but would not be able to reproduce locally). Given that the code complexity added by fixing this bug would remain with us, seems more like worst-of-both-worlds kind of situation.

But it would make VC work on remote CentOS 7 hosts again, there's that.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]