[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 2021 13:19:40 -0700 |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>>> I made a quick review of other image viewers:
>>>>
>>>> emacs gthumb geeqie eog
>>>> ----- ------ ------ ---
>>>> fit height and width Automatic Zoom 1:1 Best fit
>>>> <missing> Fit to window Fit image to window <missing>
>>>
>>> What is “Fit to window”? Does it distort the image
>>> by changing its height/width ratio?
>>
>> No, it preserves the aspect ratio.
>
> What is the difference between “Automatic” and “Fit to window”?
In gthumb, "Automatic" is like our "fit height and width" in that it
only scales down as needed, while "Fit to window" scales both up and
down.
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/04
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/04
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/05
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/11/05
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Juri Linkov, 2021/11/06
- bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down, Stefan Kangas, 2021/11/06