|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#48841: bug#47711: bug#48841: bug#47711: [PATCH VERSION 2] Add new `completion-filter-completions` API and deferred highlighting |
Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:26:44 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
On 16.08.2021 14:37, João Távora wrote:
I am not a native English speaker, and maybe you don't understand my language. Another way to explain what I am talking is to talk about "bug reproduction". You say there's a bug in my patch, I am asking you for a "bug reproduction recipe" as defined by most, if not all, the results you get by searching "bug reproduction recipe" in the Google search engine.
I hope you, or at least other here, can someday see and understand that asking to prove standard engineering practices from the first principles, time and time again in various discussions, is not a way to encourage good atmosphere or promote project participation.
Are you really not imagine a buggy scenario coming from a combination of downstream uses of 'completion-score' property, different completion styles (some setting it, and some not), and a completion table that either uses global string values outright, or caches them for the duration of the current command?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |