[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Aug 2021 11:57:01 +0300 |
> From: Andy Moreton <andrewjmoreton@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:31:06 +0100
>
> I'm not an expert on random numbers either, and your efforts are not an
> annoyance, but I am puzzled why you so strongly prize performance over
> correctness in this instance.
Because I have no idea how important the "correctness" part is, or
why. OTOH, this stuff, when used, tends to be in the inner loops, so
performance matters.
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/08/12
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/12
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/12
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/13
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/13
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Andy Moreton, 2021/08/14
- bug#32605: [w64] (random) never returns negative, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/08/15