bug#47992: 27; 28; Phase out use of `equal` in `add-hook`, `remove-hook`

[Michael Heerdegen]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> [...]
> and then this new add-hook function could refuse to accept name-less
> lambdas...

I must say I'm skeptical: in the case of `add-hook', this would be not
much different from forcing the use of symbols (aka named normal
functions).  Why add another name space (and the complexity this
implies) - where is one too limiting?


Michael.