bug#43884: Give explanation choice when asking about reverting buffers

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org> writes:

>>> Sounds serious. How about adding a "?" option that would tell the user
>>> what that means:
>
> LI> Do you have a recipe for reproducing this?
>
> $ emacs file # and edit it but don't save yet.
> $ touch file
> $ emacsclient -n file

Thanks.  In this case, I think the prompt should just be more explicit
so that a "?" isn't necessary.  So I've made this change in Emacs 28
instead for this scenario.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no