[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#48683: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Feature suggestion gnus-summary-toggle-mark-
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#48683: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Feature suggestion gnus-summary-toggle-mark-as-processable |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jun 2021 08:23:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alex Bochannek <alex@bochannek.com> writes:
>> It seems like many people would prefer to have the `#' command be a
>> toggle. Perhaps we should just add a user option to have `#' toggle or
>> not? (Defaulting to "not toggle" for backwards compatibility.)
>
> How about something like this?
Looks good. Some small comments:
> +(defcustom gnus-summary-process-mark-toggle nil
Perhaps this should be gnus-process-mark-toggle and also work in the
Group buffer?
> + (if (eq t unmark)
> + (gnus-summary-remove-process-mark article)
> + (if (eq t gnus-summary-process-mark-toggle)
We shouldn't check against t in either of these cases -- any non-nil
value is valid.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- bug#48683: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Feature suggestion gnus-summary-toggle-mark-as-processable,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=